Sea Ray 275 | Amberjack

Mooring Cleats, so boat can be moored solo. Ruined my hol I cannot solo moor using awkward mooring rings and line that the actual Marina Tribunj does have. so, I could solo moor Marina Tribunj facility and Petrol Station, but not the town side non Marina facility used by Charter Co. This boat is moored outside Marina Tribunj Facility. Also, only sleeps two not four. Access to Marina Facilities: had to request should be automatic and as I didn’t request a large duvet I only got a single duvet. I am 6ft 200kg was like sleeping under a towel. Better storage layout on boat: had to sleep wIth sun beds. Warning: v high fuel consumption, but fun to drive.

Weak wiring, recurring problem with fuses Damaged steps to the sea (repeatedly welded) that did not last under my weight. Instead of an apology, we received a bill for another 200Eur. Boat insurance is not possible, they only accept cash deposits.

Feedback to Boataround Misrepresentation of the vessel's position. According to the description of the ship, it is anchored in Marina Tribunj, but in reality Marina is in the old town of Tribunj instead of Tribunj. On the one hand, this cannot be reached by car, as access is not allowed, and consequently parking is only available in the form of a remote public car park. On the other hand, due to the city berth, no port services were available, such as a closed car park, luggage cart, water block (toilet, shower) or harbor master assistance, which we expected based on what was advertised. To remedy the problem, we had to rent a berth for the boat for the first and last night at a cost, which was occasionally EUR 91, ie a total of EUR 182, or HUF 65,000. Misinformation about the size of the ship. Based on the description of the boat, the two have double beds, so we have rented it out for a full week based on the space available. In reality, there was only one double bed in the boat, which I could not reach with my height of 177 cm, not to mention my husband, who was 185 cm tall, so he slept on the deck from the second night with the two seats facing each other. I wouldn't call it either). In addition to the difficulty of sleeping, the placement of food and drink and clothes to take with us on a week-long vacation is also a challenge, and we spent our time in an extremely uncomfortable scarcity. Misinformation about the ship 's consumption. The ship is described as consuming 30 liters of fuel per hour. When we took over the ship, we asked a charter company employee about the conditions under which we would have to sail in order to maintain this consumption. He told me the right speed range and moor trim setting for this, which we applied throughout. After the first day, we were surprised to find that the ship had consumed almost all of its fuel during the first day, I am enclosing the data calculated by the ship's route planner with the ship's settings, as well as a certificate of refueling compared to reality. It is clear from these that a total of about 100 liters of fuel would have been needed on Sunday for about 60 nautical miles, compared to 280 liters in the port of our destination, which means an consumption of 80 liters per hour for a 3.5-hour journey. Of course, at that time we did not want to keep our originally planned tour at an additional cost, so approx. we did one-third of it, spending a day on land and delivering the ship the day before, and even so, we consumed twice the calculated fuel consumption, a total of 600 liters of fuel worth HRK 6,650, which meant an additional cost of about HUF 170,000 for us. Overall, I am very frustrated and dissatisfied with the service I used, and we had a 20% more expensive holiday in a very inconvenient setting of practically 2 days minus, for which I think the broker is responsible for the misleading information posted on his website.